Exploring better methods for treating urethral stricture caused by lichen sclerosus
An JQ., Wang JW.
Narrative Review, published in Asian J Androl (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Asian J Androl (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41589064
- PMCID
- PMC13258196
- DOI
- 10.4103/aja202597
Abstract (original English)
Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis significantly associated with urethral stricture disease (USD), particularly affecting the genitalia in both sexes. While topical corticosteroids remain the first-line therapy for LS, their efficacy for deep urethral involvement is limited. Surgical intervention, primarily urethroplasty utilizing buccal mucosa grafts or lingual mucosa grafts, is often required for LS-associated USD but is associated with risks of recurrence and complications. This review explores the etiology, highlighting the roles of immune dysregulation, genetic factors, and the resulting fibrosis. Furthermore, we emphasize the emerging potential of urethral tissue engineering, which uses scaffolds seeded with progenitor or stem cells, as a promising approach for reconstructing complex LS-related strictures, although clinical translation remains limited. Future research should focus on optimizing tissue engineering solutions.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.