Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Exploring NamiRNA networks and time-series gene expression in osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells.

Jin X., Lu Y., Fan Z.

Laboratory Study, published in Ann Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Ann Med (2025)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40100054
PMCID
PMC11921168
DOI
10.1080/07853890.2025.2478323

Abstract (original English)

Background Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are a type of stem cell found in adipose tissue with the capacity to differentiate into multiple lineages, including osteoblasts. The differentiation of ADSCs into osteoblasts underlies osteogenic and pathological cellular basis in osteoporosis, bone damage and repair. Methods Focused on ADSCs osteogenic differentiation, we conducted mRNA, microRNA expression and bioinformatics analysis, including gene differential expression, time series-based trend analysis, functional enrichment, and generates potential nuclear activating miRNAs (NamiRNA) regulatory network. The screened mRNAs in NamiRNA regulatory network were validated with correlation analysis. Results The NamiRNA Regulatory Network reveals 4 mRNAs (C12orf61, MIR31HG, NFE2L1, and PCYOX1L) significantly downregulated in differentiated group and may be associated with ADSCs stemness. Furthermore, the significantly upregulated 10 genes (ACTA2, TAGLN, LY6E, IFITM3, NGFRAP1, TCEAL4, ATP5C1, CAV1, RPSA, and KDELR3) were significantly enriched in osteogenic-related pathways, and negatively correlated with ADSCs cell stemness in vitro . Conclusion These findings uncover potential genes related to ADSCs osteogenic differentiation, and provide theoretical basis for underlying ADSCs osteogenic differentiation and related diseases.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
OsteogenesisHumansCell DifferentiationAdipose TissueMicroRNAsGene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyStem CellsRNA, MessengerOsteoblasts

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.