Extracellular Vesicles in Liver Fibrosis: Pathogenic Messengers, Diagnostic Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Nanovectors
Zhao X., Zhu J., Zhang T., Xu W., Qian H.
Narrative Review, published in Pharmaceutics (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Pharmaceutics (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41754972
- PMCID
- PMC12944500
- DOI
- 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020230
Abstract (original English)
Liver fibrosis (LF) is the final common pathological outcome of various chronic liver diseases. Advanced LF can progress to severe complications, such as cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, liver transplantation remains the main clinical treatment for advanced LF, but its application is limited by donor availability and unavoidable complications. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), nanoscale particles actively released by hepatic cells, including hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and macrophages), circulate in bodily fluids carrying cell-specific cargoes (e.g., RNAs, proteins). EVs mediate intercellular communication via their specific cargo profiles and contribute to the progression in LF. Increasing evidence indicates that tracking changes in the quantity and composition of EVs in LF can aid in disease diagnosis and prognosis prediction. This review discusses the pathological role of EVs in LF development and their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and provides new perspectives for future research and treatment advances.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.