Extracellular vesicles in preeclampsia: drivers of vascular dysfunction and inflammation
Hula N., Escalera D., Goulopoulou S.
Narrative Review, published in Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41187978
- PMCID
- PMC12814908
- DOI
- 10.1152/ajpheart.00584.2025
- Citations
- 4
Abstract (original English)
Vascular inflammation, augmented vasoconstriction, reduced vasodilatory capacity, and endothelial dysfunction are cardinal features of the maternal vascular dysfunction phenotype in preeclampsia. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), bioactive molecules loaded with proteins, glycans, lipids, and nucleic acids facilitate intracellular signaling and cell-to-cell cross talk. Circulating EV concentrations rise throughout normal pregnancy; however, preeclampsia is characterized by a further increase in multiple types of EVs and a shift toward a proinflammatory, vasoactive cargo. Emerging evidence suggests that in preeclampsia, circulating EVs activate maternal endothelial cells, propagate vascular inflammation, and impair vascular tone and endothelial integrity, contributing to the development of hypertension and excess vasoconstriction. This review briefly introduces fundamental knowledge about EV biogenesis, morphology, and cargo selection, then focuses on current evidence on EV-induced endothelial inflammation and vascular dysfunction in pregnancies with preeclampsia versus uncomplicated pregnancies. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of engineered or stem cell-derived EVs to restore maternal vascular health in preeclampsia.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.