Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Extrusion-based 3D printing of photo-crosslinkable gelatin and κ-carrageenan hydrogel blends for adipose tissue regeneration.

Tytgat L., Van Damme L., Ortega Arevalo MDP., Declercq H., Thienpont H., Otteveare H.

Laboratory Study, published in Int J Biol Macromol (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Int J Biol Macromol (2019)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31422191
DOI
10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.124
Citations
70

Abstract (original English)

Current soft tissue repair techniques for women with breast cancer remain associated with several drawbacks including surgical complications and a high resorption rate for lipofilling techniques. Hence, the need to develop improved adipose tissue reconstruction strategies. Additive manufacturing can be a promising tool towards the development of patient-specific scaffolds which are able to support adipose tissue engineering. In the present work, scaffolds composed of both methacrylamide-modified gelatin (Gel-MA) and methacrylated κ-carrageenan (Car-MA), i.e. hydrogel blends, were developed using extrusion-based 3D printing in order to establish a close resemblance to the native extracellular matrix. The hydrogel blends were benchmarked to scaffolds constituting of only Gel-MA. Our results indicate that both types of scaffolds remain stable over time (21 days), are able to absorb large amounts of water and exhibit mechanical properties comparable to those of native breast tissue (2 kPa). Furthermore, a similar cell viability (> 90%) and proliferation rate after 14 days was obtained for adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) upon seeding onto both types of scaffolds. Additionally, the ASCs were able to differentiate into the adipogenic lineage on the hydrogel blend scaffolds, although their differentiation potential was lower compared to that of ASCs seeded onto the Gel-MA scaf

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipogenesisAdipose TissueCarrageenanCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChemical PhenomenaGelatinHydrogelsMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.