Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Facial-nerve regeneration ability of a hybrid artificial nerve conduit containing uncultured adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction: An experimental study.

Matsumine H., Numakura K., Climov M., Watanabe Y., Giatsidis G., Orgill DP.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 30 on Face & Skin, published in Microsurgery (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Microsurgery (2016)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
30
Source database
PubMed
PMID
27273726
DOI
10.1002/micr.30060
Citations
19

Abstract (original English)

This study investigated the potential of uncultured-stromal-vascular-fraction (SVF) cells in promoting facial nerve regeneration in a rat model. A 7-mm nerve defect was created in the buccal branch of facial nerve in five groups of Lewis rats (total n = 30, n = 6 per group). A silicone tube, infused with syngeneic uncultured-SVF was implanted into the facial nerve defect. Groups 1-3 received 1 × 10 3 , 1 × 10 5 , and 1 × 10 7 cells, and regenerated nerves were examined at 13 weeks after the surgery. The findings were compared to the autograft and collagen-alone groups with facial palsy score (FPS), the number of myelinated fibers, fiber diameter, axon diameter, myelin thickness, and g ratio. There was no significant difference in FPS between the autograft and 1 × 10 5 -cell groups at 13 weeks after surgery, and FPS values of these two groups were significantly higher than those of the other three groups (P < 0.01). Axon diameter significantly increased in the 1 × 10 5 -cell group compared with the 1 × 10 3 - (P < 0.05) and 1 × 10 7 -cell groups (P < 0.01). Myelin thickness was found to be the highest in the autograft group, followed by the 1 × 10 5 -, 1 × 10 3 -, 1 × 10 7 -cell, and negative control groups, and there were significant differences among all groups (P < 0.01). The infusion of uncultured-SVF into the artificial nerve conduit promoted optimal nerve regeneration that

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFacial Nerve InjuriesFlow CytometryMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNerve RegenerationRandom Allocation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research