Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models

Bengur FB., Stoy C., Binko MA., Nerone WV., Fedor CN., Solari MG.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33632013
PMCID
PMC9206491
DOI
10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0381
Citations
18

Abstract (original English)

Injury to the facial nerve can occur after different etiologies and range from simple transection of the branches to varying degrees of segmental loss. Management depends on the extent of injury and options include primary repair for simple transections and using autografts, allografts, or conduits for larger gaps. Tissue engineering plays an important role to create artificial materials that are able to mimic the nerve itself without extra morbidity in the patients. The use of neurotrophic factors or stem cells inside the conduits or around the repair site is being increasingly studied to enhance neural recovery to a greater extent. Preclinical studies remain the hallmark for development of these novel approaches and translation into clinical practice. This review will focus on preclinical models of repair after facial nerve injury to help researchers establish an appropriate model to quantify recovery and analyze functional outcomes. Different bioengineered materials, including conduits and nerve grafts, will be discussed based on the experimental animals that were used and the defects introduced. Future directions to extend the applications of processed nerve allografts, bioengineered conduits, and cues inside the conduits to induce neural recovery after facial nerve injury will be highlighted. Impact statement Recovery after facial nerve injury is a complex process, which i

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Facial NerveAnimalsHumansFacial Nerve InjuriesTissue EngineeringNerve RegenerationPlastic Surgery Procedures

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research