Factors influencing mesenchymal stromal cells in in vitro cellular models to study retinal pigment epithelial cell rescue.
Srivastava GK., Rodriguez-Crespo D., Fernandez-Bueno I., Pastor JC.
Animal Study, published in Hum Cell (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Hum Cell (2022)
- Country
- Japan
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 35511404
- DOI
- 10.1007/s13577-022-00705-5
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) stop or slow retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and neuroretina (NR) degeneration by paracrine activity in oxidative stress-induced retinal degenerative diseases. However, it is mandatory to develop adequate in vitro models that allow testing new treatment strategies against oxidative stress before performing in vivo studies. The viable double- and triple-layered setups are composed of separate layers of NR, MSC, and RPE (NR-MSC-RPE, NR-RPE, MSC-RPE) partially mimic in vivo retinal conditions. In this study, the paracrine neuroprotective effect of each setup's microenvironment on hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 )-stressed was compared with unstressed RPE cells. RPE cell proliferation viability was assessed on day 1, 3, and 6 using Alamar Blue® (10%), MTT (10%) and a cell viability/cytotoxicity assay kit followed by data analysis. The results showed that RPE cells, highly viable (> 90%) in mixed medium of DMEM and neurobasal A (1:1), lost 50% viability on exposure to 400 µM of H 2 O 2 (P < 0.05). The unexposed groups differed significantly from exposed groups for RPE cell growth (RPE and [Formula: see text]RPE (P < 0.0001), NR-MSC-RPE, and NR-MSC-[Formula: see text]RPE (P < 0.05), NR-RPE and NR-[Formula: see text]RPE (P < 0.01), and MSC-RPE and MSC-[Formula: see text]RPE (P < 0.01). NR-[Formula: see text]RPE and NR-RPE supported RPE cell proliferation vi
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.