Fat Graft Enhanced With Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Aesthetic Breast Augmentation: Clinical, Histological, and Instrumental Evaluation.
Gentile P., Kothari A., Casella D., Calabrese C.
Prospective Study with a reported sample of 30, published in Aesthet Surg J (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- Aesthet Surg J (2020)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- 30
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 31637416
- DOI
- 10.1093/asj/sjz292
- Citations
- 61
Abstract (original English)
Background Fat graft enhanced with adipose-derived stem cells (FG-e-ASCs) has been utilized in outcomes of radiotherapy after mastectomy, breast soft tissue defects, ulcers, and loss of substance. The authors present their experience utilizing FG-e-ASCs in breast augmentation. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a study group (SG) regarding utilization of FG-e-ASCs in breast augmentation for aesthetic improvement, comparing the results with a control group (CG). Methods A total of 46 patients affected by breast hypoplasia were treated with FG-e-ASCs, comparing results with those of a CG (n = 30) treated with fat graft not enhanced with adipose-derived stem cells (FG-ne-ASCs). The preoperative evaluation included a complete clinical evaluation, a photographic assessment, magnetic resonance imaging of the soft tissue, ultrasound, and mammography. Postoperative follow-up took place at 1, 3, 7, 12, 24, and 48 weeks and then annually. Results The patients treated with FG-e-ASCs showed 58% maintenance of the contour restoring and of 3-dimensional (3D) volume after 3 years compared with the patients of the CG treated with FG-ne-ASCs, who showed 29% maintenance. In 67.4% (n = 31) of breast augmentations treated with FG-e-ASCs, we observed a restoration of the breast contour and an increase of 10.3 mm in the 3D volume after 36 months, which was ob
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.