Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Fat Grafting to the Breast for Aesthetic Indications: Techniques and Outcomes in 165 Consecutive Patients.

Cohen SR., Patton S., Wesson J., Agovino A.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 165 on Scar, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Aesthetic Plast Surg (2023)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
165
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37985505
DOI
10.1007/s00266-023-03746-9
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Purpose Fat grafting to the breast for aesthetic indications has become increasingly popular. Herein, methods, aesthetic outcomes, and complications are reviewed in a retrospective case series. Methods Female patients (n=165) with an average age of 45 years (range: 17-78 years) who underwent fat grafting to breast were evaluated. Demographic parameters, the type of procedure, the amount of fat transferred, the site(s) of fat harvest, operative times, and the patient's postoperative recovery and outcomes were recorded. Results Of the 165 patients, 105 had breast augmentation with fat only. Of these 105 patients, 14(8%) had implant removal with and without capsulectomy, and 61(37%) had mastopexies. Composite augmentation was performed in the remaining 60 patients. The average amount of fat used was 208 cc (range: 10 to 945 cc) per breast. Forty-five patients (27%) underwent a second procedure. Of the 165 patients, 37(22%) had adverse events unrelated to the fat graft, including suture abscesses, scarring, and minor incision cite skin breakdown. Four patients (2.4%) had a complication related to fat grafting including 'lump' formation between the breast, abnormal mammograms, and the need for simple aspiration of a lipid cyst. Conclusions Autologous fat grafting should be considered for both primary and secondary aesthetic breast surgery to enhance outcomes. Complications related t

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansFemaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdipose TissueMammaplastyBreast NeoplasmsEsthetics

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research