Feeder-dependent and feeder-independent iPS cell derivation from human and mouse adipose stem cells.
Sugii S., Kida Y., Berggren WT., Evans RM.
Animal Study, published in Nat Protoc (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Nat Protoc (2011)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 21372815
- PMCID
- PMC3089977
- DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2010.199
- Citations
- 79
Abstract (original English)
Adipose tissue is an abundantly available source of proliferative and multipotent mesenchymal stem cells with promising potential for regenerative therapeutics. We previously demonstrated that both human and mouse adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) can be reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with efficiencies higher than those that have been reported for other cell types. The ASC-derived iPSCs can be generated in a feeder-independent manner, representing a unique model to study reprogramming and an important step toward establishing a safe, clinical grade of cells for therapeutic use. In this study, we provide a detailed protocol for isolation, preparation and transformation of ASCs from fat tissue into mouse iPSCs in feeder-free conditions and human iPSCs using feeder-dependent or feeder/xenobiotic-free processes. This protocol also describes how ASCs can be used as feeder cells for maintenance of other pluripotent stem cells. ASC derivation is rapid and can be completed in <1 week, with mouse and human iPS reprogramming times averaging 1.5 and 2.5 weeks, respectively.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.