Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Fibroblast-Targeted Nanodelivery Systems: Mechanisms of Collagen Remodeling Regulation and Novel Strategies for Scar Repair

Lan J., Teng Z., Huang Q., Qin F., Zheng Y., Liu Y.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Pharmaceutics (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Pharmaceutics (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41754916
PMCID
PMC12943864
DOI
10.3390/pharmaceutics18020172
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Scar formation is a common outcome of post-injury repair and can compromise both esthetic appearance and physiological function. Fibroblasts are central mediators of this process; their aberrant activation or differentiation into myofibroblasts drives fibrosis and excessive scar tissue accumulation. Nanodrug delivery systems (NDDSs) offer unique opportunities to modulate fibroblast behavior through cell-/microenvironment-guided targeting, controlled release, and stimuli-adaptive designs. Here, we summarize fibroblast biology across scar repair and delineate the mechanistic underpinnings of scar pathogenesis. We then synthesize recent progress in NDDS-enabled interventions for pathological scarring, with an emphasis on how materials design can be matched to fibroblast states and wound-stage cues. By connecting mechanisms to delivery strategies, this review provides a framework to guide the development of scar-minimizing therapies and functional tissue regeneration.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research