Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Filling effects, persistence, and safety of dermal fillers formulated with stem cells in an animal model.

Nowacki M., Pietkun K., Pokrywczyńska M., Rasmus M., Warda K., Kloskowski T.

Animal Study on Scar, Chronic Inflammation, published in Aesthet Surg J (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J (2014)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25168156
DOI
10.1177/1090820X14548212
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Background Research is scarce regarding the effectiveness of dermal fillers containing autologous stem cells. Objectives The authors sought to determine the local and systemic effects of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) as a component of dermal fillers in an animal model. Methods Wistar rats were injected with 1 of the following dermal fillers: ADSCs combined with hyaluronic acid (ADSC-HA), ADSCs combined with fish collagen (ADSC-COL), HA alone (CONTROL-HA), or COL alone (CONTROL-COL). Fillers were injected into the glabella, dorsum, and chest of each animal. The ADSCs were labeled with PKH26 to assess cell migration. Filling effects (FEs) were measured immediately after injection and at 1.5 months and 3 months after injection. Skin specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to assess localization and persistence of ADSCs. Results Mean FEs in animals implanted with ADSCs were greater and persisted longer than those of controls. No inflammatory responses were observed in any group. Three months after injection, PKH26-positive cells comprised nearly 70% of cells at the injection site in animals treated with ADSC-HA. PKH26 fluorescence also was detected in the spleen but not in the brain, kidney, or lung. Conclusions Stem cells have the potential to improve the aesthetic effects and longevity of dermal fillers.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsAutograftsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenCosmetic TechniquesFishesFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHyaluronic AcidInjections

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research