Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesPubMed

Fine-needle aspiration of renal angiomyolipoma: cytological findings and diagnostic pitfalls in a series of five cases.

Crapanzano JP.

Case Report / Series on Systemic / IV, published in Diagn Cytopathol (2005) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Diagn Cytopathol (2005)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
15584043
DOI
10.1002/dc.20179

Abstract (original English)

Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma (AML) by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) may be difficult because cytological and radiological findings sometimes overlap with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and liposarcoma. Five FNAs of AMLs were studied. Epithelioid and spindle stromal cells were arranged in loosely cohesive clusters and singly. The chromatin was evenly distributed and bland. Occasionally nuclear atypia was identified. Nuclei were oval to elongated, nucleoli were inconspicuous or absent, naked nuclei were present in three specimens, and intranuclear inclusions were present in two specimens. The cytoplasm was delicate and sometimes finely vacuolated. Adipose tissue was observed in two specimens. Thick-walled vessels, mitoses, and necrosis were absent. Corresponding surgical material showed typical features of AML. In FNA, bland chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli distinguish renal AML from RCC and liposarcoma. Adipose tissue is not universally present. Cellular atypia in conjunction with overlapping radiological findings with RCC and liposarcoma are potential diagnostic pitfalls. Immunocytochemical (ICC) stains may elucidate the correct diagnosis.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adenoma, OxyphilicAdultAgedAngiomyolipomaBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCarcinoma, Renal CellDiagnosis, DifferentialEpithelioid CellsFemaleHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research