Finger Joints Reconstructive Coverage with Cross-Arm (Colson) Flaps After Burn Injury: A Literature Review and Our Experience
Alharbi Z., Alghamdi M., Hertelendy J., Khatib K., Pallua N.
Case Report / Series, published in Healthcare (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Case Report / Series
- Journal
- Healthcare (Basel) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41373331
- PMCID
- PMC12692215
- DOI
- 10.3390/healthcare13233114
Abstract (original English)
Background: Random pattern flaps are widely used in reconstructive surgery when inadequate vascularity precludes skin graft survival or when regional pedicled flaps are unavailable due to local burn injury. Here, thin tissue from the upper arm was utilized to cover exposed cartilage over the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the contralateral hand. Methods/Technical Note: We report the uncommon application of multiple cross-arm (Colson) flaps to reconstruct dorsal skin defects over the PIP joints of the index, middle, and ring fingers following a high-voltage burn injury, in conjunction with a comprehensive literature review. Results: Three separate random-pattern flaps were harvested from the upper arm and transferred to the contralateral hand. All flaps demonstrated good perfusion, durable coverage, and a clean wound bed postoperatively, with preservation of joint mobility. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this represents one of the first reported reconstructions of multiple adjacent PIP joints using individual cross-arm flaps. This technique remains a dependable salvage option that should be considered in complex reconstructive scenarios when local or microsurgical options are not feasible.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.