Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesEurope PMCOpen access

Finger Joints Reconstructive Coverage with Cross-Arm (Colson) Flaps After Burn Injury: A Literature Review and Our Experience

Alharbi Z., Alghamdi M., Hertelendy J., Khatib K., Pallua N.

Case Report / Series, published in Healthcare (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Healthcare (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41373331
PMCID
PMC12692215
DOI
10.3390/healthcare13233114

Abstract (original English)

Background: Random pattern flaps are widely used in reconstructive surgery when inadequate vascularity precludes skin graft survival or when regional pedicled flaps are unavailable due to local burn injury. Here, thin tissue from the upper arm was utilized to cover exposed cartilage over the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the contralateral hand. Methods/Technical Note: We report the uncommon application of multiple cross-arm (Colson) flaps to reconstruct dorsal skin defects over the PIP joints of the index, middle, and ring fingers following a high-voltage burn injury, in conjunction with a comprehensive literature review. Results: Three separate random-pattern flaps were harvested from the upper arm and transferred to the contralateral hand. All flaps demonstrated good perfusion, durable coverage, and a clean wound bed postoperatively, with preservation of joint mobility. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this represents one of the first reported reconstructions of multiple adjacent PIP joints using individual cross-arm flaps. This technique remains a dependable salvage option that should be considered in complex reconstructive scenarios when local or microsurgical options are not feasible.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.