Flow cytometric characterization of cell surface markers to differentiate between fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells of different origin.
Sober SA., Darmani H., Alhattab D., Awidi A.
Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Arch Med Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Arch Med Sci (2021)
- Country
- Poland
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 37732070
- PMCID
- PMC10507789
- DOI
- 10.5114/aoms/131088
- Citations
- 17
Abstract (original English)
Introduction Identification and purification of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) expanded in culture for therapeutic use is crucial for improved yield and optimal results. Fibroblasts are the most common cell type in connective tissue and are commonly found as contaminants of MSC cultures, affecting cell yield and potentially causing tumour formation after cell transplantation. In the current study, we wished to identify cell surface markers that can differentiate MSCs of different origins from fibroblasts. Material and methods Mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from bone marrow, adipose tissue, Wharton's jelly, and placental tissue, and fibroblasts were isolated from foreskin (as a negative control) in order to examine the differences in the expression of a panel of 14 different cell surface markers using multiplex flow cytometry. Results Our results indicate that the following markers could be useful in differentiating between fibroblasts and MSCs derived from the following: adipose tissue - CD79a, CD105, CD106, CD146, and CD271; Wharton's jelly - CD14, CD56, and CD105; bone marrow - CD105, CD106, and CD146; and placental tissue - CD14, CD105, and CD146. Furthermore, we found that, contradictory to previous studies, CD26 is not fibroblast specific. Conclusions The results of our study indicate that cell surface markers may prove to be a useful tool in the discrimination betwee
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Oncologic safety of autologous fat grafting in head and neck cancer patients: A scoping review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 116 on Face & Skin, published in Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 116
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stromal Vascular Fraction-Assisted Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Meta-analysis on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Aesthetic Plast Surg - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Applications of Exosomes in Female Medicine: A Systematic Review of Molecular Biology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The use of cellular therapies for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review of behavioral and molecular outcomes.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 8 on Neuroinflammation, published in Neurosurg Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 8
Neurosurg Rev - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteogenic and Biocompatibility Potential of Polylactic Acid-Based Materials: A Systematic Review of Human Primary Cells Studies
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, published in J Funct Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Funct Biomater