Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment of hypertrophic scar clinical and histopathological evaluation

Keshk ZS., Salah MM., Samy NA.

Randomized Controlled Trial on Scar, published in Lasers Med Sci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Lasers Med Sci (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40069407
PMCID
PMC11897074
DOI
10.1007/s10103-025-04371-5
Citations
7

Abstract (original English)

Hypertrophic scar could be associated with several complications that interfere with patient daily activities, physical and psychological health and impact patient quality of life. Several therapeutics and maneuvers are used for treatment of hypertrophic scar with variable success and side effects. We aim to evaluate safety and efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser on treatment of hypertrophic scar both clinically and histopathologically. Hypertrophic scars in each patient of total thirty patients were subjected to random division with sealed envelope into two parts, part A treated with fractional carbon dioxide laser every month for 5 sessions, and part B lift without treatment for control. Hypertrophic scars in each patient were single or multiple, Single scar was more than 15 cm length. Clinical evaluation was done by two blinded dermatologists, using Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for each part before, 3 months and 6 months after treatment. Histopathological evaluation was done for each part before and 3 months after treatment by measuring epidermal thickness, collagen area percent, and elastin area percent. The upper significant clinical and histopathological improvement was shown in carbon dioxide laser treated parts than control parts without significant side effects for fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment. T

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansCicatrix, HypertrophicTreatment OutcomeAdultMiddle AgedFemaleMaleLasers, GasYoung Adult

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research