Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Free groin flap in hemifacial volume reconstruction.

Cobb AR., Koudstaal MJ., Bulstrode NW., Lloyd TW., Dunaway DJ.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 6 on Face & Skin, published in Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2012)
Country
Scotland
Reported sample size
6
Source database
PubMed
PMID
23036834
DOI
10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.09.004

Abstract (original English)

Use of the free groin flap, one of the first microvascular free flaps described, has been neglected recently because it has a short pedicle and varies anatomically. However, we have found its anatomical features and type of tissue ideal for volumetric enhancement in severe hemifacial asymmetry. We present a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 14 patients who had hemifacial augmentation with a free groin flap (mean age at operation 17 years, range 10-42) since 2001, and discuss the surgical technique. The most common cause of asymmetry was hemifacial microsomia (n=6). Anatomical variation of the vessels in the groin did not cause problems. Arterial anastomosis was to the facial artery in 13 patients; 12 patients had simultaneous hard tissue procedures. No flaps failed. The free groin flap is a useful adjunct in the management of hemifacial deficits in volume when free fat grafts will not provide enough bulk. Although the operation can take longer than non-vascularised grafts, little tissue is lost so long-term results may be more predictable. We have found the anatomy fairly consistent and the short pedicle caused no problems.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdolescentAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalAnatomic VariationArteriesBone TransplantationChildFaceFacial Asymmetry

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research