Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Future Frontiers in Bioinspired Implanted Biomaterials

Gu Q., Yuan R., Sun D., Wallace G.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Adv Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Adv Mater (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40734469
PMCID
PMC12422076
DOI
10.1002/adma.202506323
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Bioinspired materials draw design inspiration from nature's principles and integrate them with engineering requirements to construct highly functional and complex systems across multiple length scales. Bioinspired implanted biomaterials are highly promising in regenerative medicine, being designed to integrate customized materials with biological functions to replicate the complexity of living tissues. Organs are dynamic, multi-interface architectures with intricate mechanical, biochemical, and physiological properties, posing a major challenge for accurate replication. This perspective explores recent advancements in the design of natural and synthetic biomaterials, focusing on strategies like cell-laden scaffolds and cell-free constructs, which interact dynamically with the body's microenvironments to promote tissue regeneration. How smart biomaterials that respond to biological stimuli are reshaping material functionalization, offering long-term therapeutic solutions is examined. Additionally, how innovations in 3D printing, nanotechnology, and personalized medicine are overcoming current barriers and improving clinical use. Overcoming the challenges associated with replicating complex tissue structures, along with technological advancements, will be crucial to unlocking the full clinical potential of bioinspired implanted biomaterials.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringProstheses and ImplantsRegenerative MedicineNanotechnologyBiomimetic MaterialsTissue ScaffoldsPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research