Gene Therapy for Bone Repair Using Human Cells: Superior Osteogenic Potential of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2-Transduced Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adipose Tissue Compared to Bone Marrow.
Bougioukli S., Sugiyama O., Pannell W., Ortega B., Tan MH., Tang AH.
Laboratory Study, published in Hum Gene Ther (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Hum Gene Ther (2018)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 29212377
- PMCID
- PMC5909082
- DOI
- 10.1089/hum.2017.097
- Citations
- 33
Abstract (original English)
Ex vivo regional gene therapy strategies using animal mesenchymal stem cells genetically modified to overexpress osteoinductive growth factors have been successfully used in a variety of animal models to induce both heterotopic and orthotopic bone formation. However, in order to adapt regional gene therapy for clinical applications, it is essential to assess the osteogenic capacity of transduced human cells and choose the cell type that demonstrates the best clinical potential. Bone-marrow stem cells (BMSC) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) were selected in this study for in vitro evaluation, before and after transduction with a lentiviral two-step transcriptional amplification system (TSTA) overexpressing bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2; LV-TSTA-BMP-2) or green fluorescent protein (GFP; LV-TSTA-GFP). Cell growth, transduction efficiency, BMP-2 production, and osteogenic capacity were assessed. The study demonstrated that BMSC were characterized by a slower cell growth compared to ASC. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of GFP-transduced cells confirmed successful transduction with the vector and revealed an overall higher but not statistically significant transduction efficiency in ASC versus BMSC (90.2 ± 4.06% vs. 80.4 ± 8.51%, respectively; p = 0.146). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay confirmed abundant BMP-2 production by both cell types transduced with LV
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.