Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms Underlying Maternal and Fetal Complications

Lee J., Lee NK., Moon JH.

Narrative Review on Type 2 Diabetes, published in Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39844628
PMCID
PMC11898322
DOI
10.3803/enm.2024.2264
Citations
31

Abstract (original English)

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects over 10% of all pregnancies, both in Korea and worldwide. GDM not only increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, preterm birth, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and shoulder dystocia, but it also significantly increases the risk of developing postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease in the mother. Additionally, GDM is linked to a higher risk of childhood obesity and diabetes in offspring, as well as neurodevelopmental disorders, including autistic spectrum disorder. This review offers a comprehensive summary of clinical epidemiological studies concerning maternal and fetal complications and explores mechanistic investigations that reveal the underlying pathophysiology.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansPregnancy ComplicationsDiabetes, GestationalFetal DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Pregnancy OutcomePregnancyFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research