Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMC

Gli1-labeled adult mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells and hedgehog signaling contribute to endochondral heterotopic ossification

Kan C., Chen L., Hu Y., Ding N., Li Y., McGuire TL.

Animal Study on Cartilage Damage, published in Bone (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Bone (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
28645539
PMCID
PMC5801258
DOI
10.1016/j.bone.2017.06.014
Citations
62

Abstract (original English)

Heterotopic ossification (HO), acquired or hereditary, endochondral or intramembranous, is the formation of true bone outside the normal skeleton. Since perivascular Gli1+ progenitors contribute to injury induced organ fibrosis, and CD133 is expressed by a variety of populations of adult stem cells, this study utilized Cre-lox based genetic lineage tracing to test the contribution to endochondral HO of adult stem/progenitor cells that expressed either Gli1 or CD133. We found that both lineages contributed broadly to different normal tissues with distinct patterns, but that only Gli1-creERT labeled stem/progenitor cells contributed to all stages of endochondral HO in a BMP dependent, injury induced, transgenic mouse model. Hedgehog (Hh) signaling was abnormal at endochondral HO lesion sites with increased signaling surrounding the lesion but diminished signaling within it. Thus, local dysregulation of Hh signaling participates in the pathophysiology of endochondral HO. However, unlike a previous report of intramembranous HO, systemic inhibition of Hh signaling was insufficient to prevent the initiation of the endochondral HO process or to treat the existing endochondral HO, suggesting that Hh participates in, but is not essential for endochondral HO in this model. This could potentially reflect the underlying difference between intramembranous and endochondral HO. Nevertheless,

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsMice, TransgenicMiceOssification, HeterotopicPyrimidinonesThiophenesSignal TransductionOsteogenesisHedgehog Proteins

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research