Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Global Variation in Studies of Articular Cartilage Procedures of the Knee: A Systematic Review

Steinmetz RG., Guth JJ., Matava MJ., Smith MV., Brophy RH.

Systematic Review with a reported sample of 60 on Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Cartilage (2022)
Reported sample size
60
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
35578752
PMCID
PMC9251824
DOI
10.1177/19476035221098169
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether there are significant differences in terms of indications, techniques, patient variables, and objective and subjective outcome scores as a function of the geographic locale of published studies of knee articular cartilage surgery. Methods An electronic database search was performed of clinical studies evaluating knee articular cartilage procedures from 2000 to 2021. Studies were separated into global regions (Europe, Asia, North America, and South America) based on the study country. All cartilage-based treatments in each region were recorded. Patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, cartilage lesion size and location, follow-up time, failure rate, and knee outcome scores utilized were summarized and compared by region. Results A total of 2,923 studies were analyzed. Eighty level 1 and 2 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were from Europe ( n = 60), followed by Asia ( n = 11), North America ( n = 7), and South America ( n = 2). The majority of procedures in European and North American studies were cell-based and marrow-stimulation procedures. In Asian studies, the most common procedures were marrow-stimulation, experimental, and biologic procedures as defined by the authors. Asian countries had a higher proportion of females ( P P Conclusion Most high-level evidence for articular cartilage-based proce

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
Cartilage, ArticularKnee JointHumansCartilage DiseasesKnee InjuriesOrthopedic ProceduresFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research