Graphene-Based Materials for Bone Regeneration in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Applications and Material Comparisons

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Graphene, a two-dimensional arrangement of carbon atoms, has drawn significant interest in medical research due to its unique properties. In the context of bone regeneration, graphene has shown several promising applications. Its robust structure, electrical conductivity, and biocompatibility make it an ideal candidate for enhancing bone tissue regeneration and repair processes. Studies have revealed that the presence of graphene can stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of bone cells, thereby promoting the formation of new bone tissue. Additionally, its ability to act as an effective carrier for growth factors and drugs allows controlled release, facilitating the engineering of specific tissues for bone regeneration. Aim To assess the efficacy of graphene in enhancing bone regeneration through in vitro studies, identify key safety concerns, and propose directions for future research to optimize its clinical applicability. Materials and methods The present systematic review was carried out using the PRISMA 2020 guideline. A first search was carried out on 20 November 2023 and was later updated on 14 February and 15 April 2024 in the databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Those in vitro studies published in English that evaluated the potential for bone regeneration with graphene in dentistry and also those which met the search terms were selected

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.