Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Graphene-based materials: an innovative approach for neural regeneration and spinal cord injury repair

Yari-Ilkhchi A., Hamidi N., Mahkam M., Ebrahimi-Kalan A.

Narrative Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in RSC Adv (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
RSC Adv (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40165920
PMCID
PMC11956154
DOI
10.1039/d4ra07976k
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Spinal cord injury (SCI), the most serious disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS), is one of contemporary medicine's most difficult challenges, causing patients to suffer physically, emotionally, and socially. However, due to recent advances in medical science and biomaterials, graphene-based materials (GBMs) have tremendous potential in SCI therapy due to their wonderful and valuable properties, such as physicochemical properties, extraordinary electrical conductivity, distinct morphology, and high mechanical strength. This review discusses SCI pathology and GBM characteristics, as well as recent in vitro and in vivo findings on graphenic scaffolds, electrodes, and injectable achievements for SCI improvement using neuroprotective and neuroregenerative techniques to improve neural structural and functional repair. Additionally, it suggests possible ideas and desirable products for graphene-based technological advances, intending to reach therapeutic importance for SCI.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research