Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMC

Groupe pour L’Avancement de la Microchirurgie Canada (GAM) : Abstracts presented at the 31st Annual Meeting / 31e Reunion annuele June 16, 2010

Prospective Study on Face & Skin, Hip, published in Can J Plast Surg (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Can J Plast Surg (2010)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMCID
PMC2933098

Abstract (original English)

PURPOSE: The objective was to compare the functional, psychological and disease-specific quality of life (QOL) outcomes in oral cancer patients following conservative vs. surgical treatment with resection/microvascular reconstruction. METHODS: Oral cancer patients at the Princess Margaret Hospital between January 1999–2009 provided data. Two ORN treatment groups: ORN surgical group 1 – resection/microvascular mandibular reconstruction and ORN conservative group 3 – ORN with conservative management were matched on age, sex and time since radiation with two non-ORN groups: Non-ORN surgical group 2 – surgical excision, mandibular reconstruction/radiation and non-ORN group 4 – radiation alone. One time self-report surveys included: the CES – Depression Scale (emotional distress); Affect Balance Scale (psychological well-being); and the Atkinson Life Happiness Rating Scale. Treatment-related concerns were measured using Andrykowski’s “Back to Normal” and a Fear-of-Cancer-Recurrence item and QOL using the EORTC – HN37. RESULTS: A multivariate analysis of covariance was performed comparing the 4 matched groups and controlling for empirically identified covariates. ORN surgical group 1 and non-ORN surgical group 2 reported significantly higher subjective wellbeing as compared to the non-surgically treated ORN conservative group 3 (p=0.02); due largely to depressive symptoms. ORN groups

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research