Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition)

Cossarizza A., Chang HD., Radbruch A., Acs A., Adam D., Adam-Klages S.

Laboratory Study, published in Eur J Immunol (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Eur J Immunol (2019)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31633216
PMCID
PMC7350392
DOI
10.1002/eji.201970107
Citations
833

Abstract (original English)

These guidelines are a consensus work of a considerable number of members of the immunology and flow cytometry community. They provide the theory and key practical aspects of flow cytometry enabling immunologists to avoid the common errors that often undermine immunological data. Notably, there are comprehensive sections of all major immune cell types with helpful Tables detailing phenotypes in murine and human cells. The latest flow cytometry techniques and applications are also described, featuring examples of the data that can be generated and, importantly, how the data can be analysed. Furthermore, there are sections detailing tips, tricks and pitfalls to avoid, all written and peer-reviewed by leading experts in the field, making this an essential research companion.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansFlow CytometryCell SeparationConsensusAllergy and ImmunologyPhenotype

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.