Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Harnessing Cross-Linked Cysteine Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Engineering Applications

Mtetwa L., Marimuthu T., Mndlovu H., Sithole MN., Makatini MM., Choonara YE.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Polymers (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Polymers (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41374917
PMCID
PMC12694466
DOI
10.3390/polym17233231

Abstract (original English)

Biomaterials are either cross-linked ionically, chemically, or physically, or they can be functionalized with amino acids to overcome inherent biocompatibility and stability limitations. Hydrogels for scaffold fabrication have been effectively utilized to promote tissue integration and cellular processes for soft tissue regeneration. Despite significant progress, poor remodeling limitations persist, hence the need for cross-linkers with dynamic adaptability, native tissue mimicry, and controllable degradation. The aim of this review is to highlight cysteine's capability and potential to cross-link biomaterials using thiol chemistry while discussing the different cross-linking strategies to aid in the fabrication of robust hydrogel inks and bioinks. Furthermore, cysteine's limitations and research scarcity in soft tissue scaffolds are highlighted for its chemical significance and potential role. The review examines cysteine's thiol reactions, including disulfide bonds, thiol-ene, thiol-yne, and Michael additions, and cross-linking ability, with a specialized focus on adipose tissue regeneration. The fabrication methods reviewed include 3D bioprinting, electrospinning, films, and nanostructured scaffolds, with a primary focus on 3D bioprinting of hydrogel scaffolds. Cysteine cross-linking enhances the scaffolds' stability, printability, biocompatibility, degradability, and biolog

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research