Harvest tissue source does not alter the protective power of stromal cell therapy after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion injury
Jensen AR., Manning MM., Khaneki S., Drucker NA., Markel TA.
Animal Study, published in J Surg Res (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- J Surg Res (2016)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 27565072
- PMCID
- PMC5002874
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.006
- Citations
- 20
Abstract (original English)
Background Transplantation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may be a novel treatment for intestinal ischemia. The optimal stromal cell source that could yield maximal protection after injury, however, has not been identified. We hypothesized that (1) MSCs would increase survival and mesenteric perfusion, preserve intestinal histologic architecture, and limit inflammation after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury, and (2) MSCs harvested from different sources of tissue would have equivalent protective properties to the intestine after I/R inury. Methods Adult male mice were anesthetized, and a midline laparotomy was performed. The intestines were eviscerated, the small bowel mesenteric root was identified, and baseline intestinal perfusion was determined using laser Doppler imaging. Intestinal ischemia was established by temporarily occluding the superior mesenteric artery for 60 min with a noncrushing clamp. After ischemia, the clamp was removed and the intestines were allowed to recover. Before abdominal closure, 2 × 10(6) human umbilical cord-derived MSCs, bone marrow-derived MSCs, or keratinocytes in 250 μL of phosphate-buffered saline vehicle were injected into the peritoneum. Animals were allowed to recover for 12 or 24 h (perfusion, histology, and inflammatory studies) or 7 d (survival studies). Survival data was analyzed using the log-rank test. Perfusion
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.