High Hopes for the Biofabrication of Articular Cartilage-What Lies beyond the Horizon of Tissue Engineering and 3D Bioprinting?
Sbirkov Y., Redzheb M., Forraz N., McGuckin C., Sarafian V.
Narrative Review, published in Biomedicines (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Biomedicines (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 38540278
- PMCID
- PMC10968021
- DOI
- 10.3390/biomedicines12030665
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Technologies and biomaterials for 3D bioprinting have been developing extremely quickly in the past decade as they hold great potential in tissue engineering. This, together with the possibility to differentiate stem cells of different origin into any cell type, raises the hopes in regenerative medicine once again after the initial breakthrough with stem cells in the 1980s. Nevertheless, three decades of 3D bioprinting experiments have shown that the production of functional tissues would take a longer time than anticipated. Cartilage, one of the simplest tissues in the body, consists of only one cell type. It is not vascularised and innervated and does not have lymphatic vessels either, which makes it a perfect target tissue for successful implantation. The tremendous amount of work since the beginning of this century, combining the efforts of bioengineers, material scientists, biologists, and physicians, has culminated in multiple proof-of-concept constructs that have been implanted in animals. However, there is no single reproducible, standardised, widely accessible and accepted strategy that can be readily applied in the clinic. In this review, we focus on the current progress in the field of the 3D biofabrication of articular cartilage and critically assess failures and future challenges.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.