Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Historical evolution, hotspots, and trends in tendon tissue engineering: A bibliometric analysis

Hou W., Liu W., Tan M., Fang J., Cao K., Du X.

Laboratory Study on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in Regen Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Regen Ther (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40487919
PMCID
PMC12144915
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2025.04.009
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Introduction As a significant branch of tissue engineering, tendon tissue engineering has developed rapidly, driven by advancements in new technologies and the refinement of medical theories. This study summarizes its development by analyzing historical evolution, research hotspots, and future trends to reveal core research directions and potential pathways. Methods Based on literature from WoS CC (1991-2024) and analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Bibliometrix, the study evaluates publication trends and research patterns. Results Findings show continuous growth in annual publications. The United States and China are key contributors with close collaboration. Chang James is the most prolific author, and stable research teams have emerged, though inter-team cooperation remains limited. Acta Biomaterialia publishes the most papers in this field, characterized by interdisciplinary integration. Key research focuses include scaffolds, seed cells, and rotator cuff injuries. Frontiers involve ideal scaffold construction, tendon adhesion prevention, and regeneration strategies. Future directions emphasize novel biomaterials, tendon-bone interface healing, innovative seed cell cultivation, tendon growth microenvironment construction, and clinical translation of research outcomes. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis reveals the core research directions and potential pathways in te

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research