The homeostasis and heterogeneity of regulatory T cells in sepsis
Wu D., Zhang H., Miao C.
Laboratory Study, published in Burns Trauma (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Burns Trauma (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40873496
- PMCID
- PMC12378600
- DOI
- 10.1093/burnst/tkaf047
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Sepsis poses a critical threat to global health, mainly due to the disruption of immune homeostasis, which critically influences both early death and long-term adverse outcomes. Current evidence shows that regulatory T (Treg) cells-key mediators of adaptive immunity-play an essential role in maintaining immunological balance during sepsis progression. During the initial hyperinflammatory phase, Treg cells actively suppress excessive inflammation, reducing tissue damage. Paradoxically, in the subsequent immunosuppressive phase, expanded Treg populations may exacerbate immunosuppression by inhibiting effector cell function, ultimately leading to poorer clinical outcomes. Recent research has identified novel Treg-specific biomarkers in sepsis and explained how the septic environment affects Treg cell numbers and function through various signaling pathways. This review combines current understanding of the phenotypic features and roles of Treg cells in sepsis, examines the regulatory mechanisms controlling Treg dynamics within the inflammatory setting, and explores therapeutic strategies targeting Treg cells across different immune phases, emphasizing both existing challenges and future directions.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.