How chondrogenic are human umbilical cord matrix cells? A comparison to adipose-derived stem cells.
Hildner F., Wolbank S., Redl H., van Griensven M., Peterbauer A.
Laboratory Study on Cartilage Damage, published in J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2010)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 19998317
- DOI
- 10.1002/term.236
- Citations
- 18
Abstract (original English)
The umbilical cord matrix as well as liposuction material have been demonstrated to contain cells capable of differentiating towards the mesodermal lineage. High availability and low donor site morbidity appear promising for the use of human umbilical cord matrix cells (HUCMs) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in cell-based therapies. In the present study we focused on cartilage regeneration and compared HUCMs and ASCs regarding their potential to differentiate towards the chondrogenic lineage. Cells were isolated by explantation culture or enzymatic digestion, phenotypically characterized by flow cytometry and differentiated as 3D micromass pellets for up to 35 days. Under tested conditions, ASCs demonstrated significantly higher glycosaminoglycan synthesis compared to HUCMs. qRT-PCR data gave evidence that chondrogenic genes are expressed by both ASCs and HUCMs. However, higher expression levels of ASCs suggest that this cell type has higher potential for differentiation towards a cartilage-like phenotype than HUCMs. In conclusion, both cell types, HUCMs and ASCs, are easily available, possess typical properties of mesenchymal stem cells and are thus promising for cell-based therapies. However, in terms of cartilage regeneration, ASCs might be more suitable than HUCMs.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Systematic Review on Amnion as a Cell Delivery Scaffolding Material for Cartilage Regeneration in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel)1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular adipose-derived cell therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5
Cartilage - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Cartilage Damage, published in J Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Transl Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Exp Orthop (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Exp Orthop - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Comparison of the Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Synovial Sources: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci