Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

How chondrogenic are human umbilical cord matrix cells? A comparison to adipose-derived stem cells.

Hildner F., Wolbank S., Redl H., van Griensven M., Peterbauer A.

Laboratory Study on Cartilage Damage, published in J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2010)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
19998317
DOI
10.1002/term.236
Citations
18

Abstract (original English)

The umbilical cord matrix as well as liposuction material have been demonstrated to contain cells capable of differentiating towards the mesodermal lineage. High availability and low donor site morbidity appear promising for the use of human umbilical cord matrix cells (HUCMs) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in cell-based therapies. In the present study we focused on cartilage regeneration and compared HUCMs and ASCs regarding their potential to differentiate towards the chondrogenic lineage. Cells were isolated by explantation culture or enzymatic digestion, phenotypically characterized by flow cytometry and differentiated as 3D micromass pellets for up to 35 days. Under tested conditions, ASCs demonstrated significantly higher glycosaminoglycan synthesis compared to HUCMs. qRT-PCR data gave evidence that chondrogenic genes are expressed by both ASCs and HUCMs. However, higher expression levels of ASCs suggest that this cell type has higher potential for differentiation towards a cartilage-like phenotype than HUCMs. In conclusion, both cell types, HUCMs and ASCs, are easily available, possess typical properties of mesenchymal stem cells and are thus promising for cell-based therapies. However, in terms of cartilage regeneration, ASCs might be more suitable than HUCMs.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCell DifferentiationFlow CytometryGlycosaminoglycansHumansImmunohistochemistryReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionStem CellsUmbilical Cord

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research