How to isolate a ready-to-use adipose-derived stem cells pellet for clinical application.
Raposio E., Bertozzi N.
Narrative Review, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2017)
- Country
- Italy
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 29028071
- Citations
- 23
Abstract (original English)
Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that show definitive stem cell characteristics such as plastic adherence in culture, ability to maintain multipotency upon in vitro expansion, and self-renewal capacity. ASCs are particularly promising for use in regenerative medicine because they can be harvested easily from adipose tissue by standard liposuction, with minimal donor site morbidity. Since ASCs do not necessitate ex vivo expansion to obtain clinically significant cell numbers, it is critical to identify a standardized method that maximizes the number of ASCs collected. Based on current literature, there is no standardized method to isolate ASCs for clinical application. Furthermore, clinical studies involving ASCs often show inconsistencies in the reported results. Such studies often use research-derived isolation protocols, which are complex, time-consuming, and involve the use of chemical and animal-derived reagents. In this paper, we present an in-depth review of the available data on ASC isolation protocols. Moreover, we describe our isolation protocol that allows the collection of a ready-to-use ASC pellet for clinical application.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.