Human Adipose-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells Accelerate Epithelialization of Radiation Ulcers in Nude Mice.
Mori M., Saito N., Shirado T., Wu Y., Asahi R., Yoshizumi K.
Animal Study with a reported sample of 4, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Plast Reconstr Surg (2023)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- 4
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 37224423
- DOI
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010756
Abstract (original English)
Cotransplantation of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and endothelial progenitor cells has shown superior angiogenic effects compared with ASCs alone in recent animal studies. However, endothelial progenitor cells could only be collected from blood vessels or bone marrow. Thus, the authors have established a method for purifying adipose-derived endothelial progenitor cells (AEPCs). The authors hypothesized that AEPCs would enhance the therapeutic effect of ASCs on radiation ulcers. Seven-week-old male nude mice (BALB/cAJcl-nu/nu) were irradiated on the dorsal skin (total 40 Gy); 12 weeks later, 6-mm-diameter wounds were created. The mice were then treated with subcutaneous injection of human ASCs [1 × 10 5 ( n = 4)], human AEPCs [2 × 10 5 or 5 × 10 5 ( n = 5)], combinations of those [ASCs 1 × 10 5 plus AEPCs 2 × 10 5 ( n = 4) or 5 × 10 5 ( n = 5)], or only vehicle ( n = 7). The nonirradiated group was also prepared as a control ( n = 6). The days required for macroscopic epithelialization was compared, and immunostaining for human-derived cells and vascular endothelial cells was performed at day 28. AEPC-ASC combination-treated groups healed faster than the ASC-treated group (14 ± 0 days versus 17 ± 2 days; P < 0.01). Engraftment of the injected cells could not be confirmed. Only the nonirradiated mice had significantly higher vascular density (0.988 ± 0.183 × 10 -5 /µm -2 ver
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.