Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Human adipose-derived stem cells as future tools in tissue regeneration: osteogenic differentiation and cell-scaffold interaction.

De Girolamo L., Sartori MF., Arrigoni E., Rimondini L., Albisetti W., Weinstein RL.

Animal Study, published in Int J Artif Organs (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Artif Organs (2008)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18609499
DOI
10.1177/039139880803100602
Citations
38

Abstract (original English)

Tissue engineering is now contributing to new developments in several clinical fields, and mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue (hASCs) may provide a novel opportunity to replace, repair and promote the regeneration of diseased or damaged musculoskeletal tissue. Our interest was to characterize and differentiate hASCs isolated from twenty-three donors. Proliferation, CFU-F, cytofluorimetric and histochemistry analyses were performed. HASCs differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineages, as assessed by tissue-specific markers such as alkaline phosphatase, osteopontin expression and deposition of calcium matrix, lipid-vacuoles formation and Glycosaminoglycans production. We also compared osteo-differentiated hASCs cultured on monolayer and loaded on biomaterials routinely used in the clinic, such as hydroxyapatite, cancellous human bone fragments, deproteinized bovine bone granules, and titanium. Scaffolds loaded with pre-differentiated hASCs do not affect cell proliferation and no cellular toxicity was observed. HASCs tightly adhere to scaffolds and differentiated-hASCs on human bone fragments and bovine bone granules produced, respectively, 3.4- and 2.1-fold more calcified matrix than osteo-differentiated hASCs on monolayer. Moreover, both human and deproteinized bovine bone is able to induce osteogenic differentiation of CTRL-hASCs. Although

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCattleCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationDurapatiteFibroblastsFlow Cytometry

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.