Human platelet lysate standardization across three independent European blood establishments
Delabie W., Boretti G., Groot SA., Ardanary D., Sigurjónsson O., Klei TRL.
Laboratory Study, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Stem Cell Res Ther (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40598301
- PMCID
- PMC12210671
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13287-025-04445-9
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Human platelet lysate (hPL) is a clinically safe alternative to fetal bovine serum (FBS). However, variability in blood donation practices, platelet concentrate preparation methods, storage and hPL manufacturing complicates standardization across jurisdictions. This study aimed to establish a first multinational hPL manufacturing standardization across three European blood centers to test feasibility and variability. A single batch of hPL production sets was distributed to the participating centers. There, hPL was produced following a single standard operating protocol but starting from each center's unique platelet concentrates. Each center prepared four 'national' hPL batches and four 'international' batches. Researchers conducted blinded quality and variation analyses to ensure unbiased results. All hPL batches exhibited comparable total protein levels, pH, ionic strength, and lactate content. Analysis of twelve growth factors showed minor variations across batches. Endothelial cell outgrowth and wound closure were slower in hPL than FBS but remained consistent across batches. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) doubling was significantly faster in hPL than in FBS, with MSC phenotype consistency confirmed via flow cytometry. Differentiation into adipogenic and osteogenic tissue was successful in all hPL samples. The inter-institutional variation across all national batches was highe
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.