Hybrid spheroid microscaffolds as modular tissue units to build macro-tissue assemblies for tissue engineering.
Guillaume O., Kopinski-Grünwald O., Weisgrab G., Baumgartner T., Arslan A., Whitmore K.
Laboratory Study, published in Acta Biomater (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Acta Biomater (2022)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 35288312
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.010
Abstract (original English)
Since its inception, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) has been relying on either scaffold-based or scaffold-free strategies. Recent reports outlined the possibility of a synergistic, convergence approach, referred to as the third TERM strategy, which could alleviate bottlenecks of the two previous options. This strategy requires the fabrication of highly porous microscaffolds, allowing to create single spheroids within each of them. The resulting tissue units can then be combined and used as modular building blocks for creating tissue constructs through a bottom-up self-assembly. Such strategy can have a significant impact for the future of TERM, but so far, no reports have assessed its feasibility in detail. This work reports a first systematic study, which includes a comparison of the in vitro behavior of tissue units based on adipose derived stem cell spheroids cultured within microscaffolds versus conventional spheroids. We first proved that the presence of the microscaffold neither impairs the cells 'ability to form spheroids nor impacts their viability. Importantly, the fusiogenic and the differentiation potential (i.e. chondrogenesis and osteogenesis), which are important features for cellularized building blocks to be used in TERM, are preserved when spheroids are cultured within microscaffolds. Significant benefits of microscaffold-based tissue units
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.