Hydrogel-based biomaterials for brain regeneration after stroke: Gap to clinical translation
Li H., Gu T., Xu J., Gan L., Liu C., Wan J.
Narrative Review on Stroke Research, published in Biomater Transl (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Biomater Transl (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40641992
- PMCID
- PMC12237804
- DOI
- 10.12336/bmt.24.00020
- Citations
- 5
Abstract (original English)
Due to the limited effects of current treatments on brain repair and regeneration, stroke continues to be the predominant cause of death and long-term disability on a global scale. In recent years, hydrogel-based biomaterials combined with stem cells and extracellular vesicles have emerged as promising new treatments to improve brain regeneration after stroke. However, the clinical translation of hydrogel-based biomaterials for the treatment of brain injury is still far from satisfactory. In this review, we first summarise the present status of stroke-related clinical treatments and the advantages provided by hydrogel-based materials in combination with stem cells and extracellular vesicles in preclinical studies. We then focus on the possible causes of the gap between preclinical studies and clinical translation of hydrogel-based biomaterials from the perspective of biocompatibility and safety, the choices of preclinical models, the lack of clinical noninvasive imaging methods, standardisation and quality control, manufacturing scalability, and regulatory compliance. With the progress in the abovementioned areas, we believe that the clinical translation of hydrogel-based biomaterials will greatly improve brain regeneration after stroke and that this improvement will be realised by the general public in the near future.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: neuroimaging approaches and evidence from a systematic review
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in Front Neurol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Neurol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 3345 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Syst Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3345
Syst Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Curr Cardiol Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Curr Cardiol Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in Animal Models: A Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in CNS Neurosci Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
CNS Neurosci Ther5 citations - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 1184 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 1184
Stem Cell Res Ther2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
In vitro and In vivo Studies on Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Ischemic Stroke Therapy: A Scoping Review of The Therapeutic Effect
Systematic Review on Stroke Research, published in Stem Cells Cloning (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Stem Cells Cloning