Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Hydrogel soft tissue expander for gingiva-periosteal expansion: a narrative literature review

Lee CY., Kim B., Lee SH., Mustakim KR., Eo MY., Won C.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42230857
PMCID
PMC13246980
DOI
10.1186/s40902-026-00515-x

Abstract (original English)

Background Soft tissue expanders (STEs) are used in reconstructive surgeries to stretch tissues gradually, providing space for implants or facilitating bone augmentation. These devices have evolved from traditional silicone balloon expanders to modern self-inflating osmotic systems, which offer more controlled and less invasive expansion. This review explores the advancements in STEs, particularly the use of hydrogels, and their applications in clinical settings. Main text Recent studies indicate that tissue expansion facilitates soft tissue growth through mechanical stretch and biological creep, enhancing vascularity and promoting fibroblast proliferation. The extracellular matrix transmits mechanical forces that influence cell behavior, while excessive pressure may lead to bone resorption, soft tissue necrosis, and expander exposure. Modern STEs include hydrogel-based, self-inflating types that absorb interstitial fluids to enable gradual expansion. These devices offer advantages such as biocompatibility, minimal scarring, and simplified surgical procedures. However, complications such as temporary deformity, hypoxia, allergic reactions, and infection remain important clinical concerns. Conclusion Hydrogels in STEs need to balance effective expansion with minimal toxicity or morbidity. A key challenge is finding a patient-compliant, economic solution for tissue expansion befo

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research