Hydrogel soft tissue expander for gingiva-periosteal expansion: a narrative literature review
Lee CY., Kim B., Lee SH., Mustakim KR., Eo MY., Won C.
Narrative Review on Scar, published in Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 42230857
- PMCID
- PMC13246980
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40902-026-00515-x
Abstract (original English)
Background Soft tissue expanders (STEs) are used in reconstructive surgeries to stretch tissues gradually, providing space for implants or facilitating bone augmentation. These devices have evolved from traditional silicone balloon expanders to modern self-inflating osmotic systems, which offer more controlled and less invasive expansion. This review explores the advancements in STEs, particularly the use of hydrogels, and their applications in clinical settings. Main text Recent studies indicate that tissue expansion facilitates soft tissue growth through mechanical stretch and biological creep, enhancing vascularity and promoting fibroblast proliferation. The extracellular matrix transmits mechanical forces that influence cell behavior, while excessive pressure may lead to bone resorption, soft tissue necrosis, and expander exposure. Modern STEs include hydrogel-based, self-inflating types that absorb interstitial fluids to enable gradual expansion. These devices offer advantages such as biocompatibility, minimal scarring, and simplified surgical procedures. However, complications such as temporary deformity, hypoxia, allergic reactions, and infection remain important clinical concerns. Conclusion Hydrogels in STEs need to balance effective expansion with minimal toxicity or morbidity. A key challenge is finding a patient-compliant, economic solution for tissue expansion befo
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations