Hydrogels for Neural Regeneration: Exploring New Horizons
Omidian H., Chowdhury SD., Cubeddu LX.
Narrative Review, published in Materials (Basel) (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Materials (Basel) (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39063768
- PMCID
- PMC11278084
- DOI
- 10.3390/ma17143472
- Citations
- 14
Abstract (original English)
Nerve injury can significantly impair motor, sensory, and autonomic functions. Understanding nerve degeneration, particularly Wallerian degeneration, and the mechanisms of nerve regeneration is crucial for developing effective treatments. This manuscript reviews the use of advanced hydrogels that have been researched to enhance nerve regeneration. Hydrogels, due to their biocompatibility, tunable properties, and ability to create a supportive microenvironment, are being explored for their effectiveness in nerve repair. Various types of hydrogels, such as chitosan-, alginate-, collagen-, hyaluronic acid-, and peptide-based hydrogels, are discussed for their roles in promoting axonal growth, functional recovery, and myelination. Advanced formulations incorporating growth factors, bioactive molecules, and stem cells show significant promise in overcoming the limitations of traditional therapies. Despite these advancements, challenges in achieving robust and reliable nerve regeneration remain, necessitating ongoing research to optimize hydrogel-based interventions for neural regeneration.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.