Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesPubMed

Hypothesis: Intravenous administration of mesenchymal stem cells is effective in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Shigematsu K., Takeda T., Komori N., Tahara K., Yamagishi H.

Case Report / Series on Neuroinflammation, Chronic Inflammation, published in Med Hypotheses (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Med Hypotheses (2021)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33799163
DOI
10.1016/j.mehy.2021.110572
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

We propose the intravenous administration of autologous adipose-derived stem cells as a new treatment for Alzheimer's disease. We hypothesize that the stem cells will secrete neprilysin in the brain to break down and remove amyloid deposits in the Alzheimer's brain. We have shown a case of skin amyloid deposition that disappeared after stem cell administration and confirmed that the stem cells administered had neprilysin activity. In addition to neprilysin secretion, other mechanisms of action of stem cells include nerve regeneration, nerve repair, growth factor secretion, anti-inflammatory effects, and angiogenesis. The harvesting of adipose-derived stem cells is minimally invasive, and intravenous administration can be safely repeated. We hope that the efficacy of this new treatment will be verified and that it will bring a ray of hope to patients suffering from this incurable disease.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Administration, IntravenousAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsNeprilysin

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research