Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Identification of structural DNA variations in human cell cultures after long-term passage.

Pavlova GV., Vergun AA., Rybalkina EY., Butovskaya PR., Ryskov AP.

Laboratory Study, published in Cell Cycle (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Cell Cycle (2015)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25607645
PMCID
PMC4353222
DOI
10.4161/15384101.2014.974427
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was adapted for genomic identification of cell cultures and evaluation of DNA stability in cells of different origin at different culture passages. DNA stability was observed in cultures after no more than 5 passages. Adipose-derived stromal cells demonstrated increased DNA instability. RAPD fragments from different cell lines after different number of passages were cloned and sequenced. The chromosomal localization of these fragments was identified and single-nucleotide variations in RAPD fragments isolated from cell lines after 8-12 passages were revealed. Some of them had permanent localization, while most variations demonstrated random distribution and can be considered as de novo mutations.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCells, CulturedChromosomal InstabilityDNADNA PrimersHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueStromal Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.