Identifying differentiation markers between dermal fibroblasts and adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AD-MSCs) in human visceral and subcutaneous tissues using single-cell transcriptomics.

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AD-MSCs) and fibroblasts are both widely used in regenerative medicine, demonstrating significant potential for personalized cell therapy. A major challenge in their use lies in their high biological similarity, encompassing morphology, differentiation capabilities, and flow cytometric markers, making their distinction difficult. Methods In our study, we aimed to compare AD-MSCs obtained from two types of adipose tissue, subcutaneous and visceral, alongside skin fibroblasts. Notably, all tissue samples were sourced from the same donors. We analyzed the cells for surface antigens via flow cytometry and conducted single-cell RNA sequencing, followed by verification with quantitative PCR (qPCR). Results Our results revealed phenotypic similarities between the isolated AD-MSCs and dermal fibroblasts, particularly in the expression of markers characteristic of AD-MSCs. However, through in-depth analyses, we identified distinct differences between these cell types. Specifically, we pinpointed 30 genes exhibiting the most significant variations in expression between AD-MSCs and fibroblasts. These genes are associated with biological processes such as tissue remodeling, cell movement, and activation in response to external stimuli. Among them, MMP1, MMP3, S100A4, CXCL1, PI16, IGFBP5, COMP were further validated using qPCR, clearly d

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.