Identifying potential miRNA-disease associations through an accurate matrix completion approach
Li B., Zhong K., Deveci M., Tang Y.
Laboratory Study, published in Brief Bioinform (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Brief Bioinform (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40874820
- PMCID
- PMC12392271
- DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbaf444
Abstract (original English)
Exploring latent microRNA (miRNA)-disease associations (MDAs) is vital for early screening and treatment. Compared with traditional experiments, computational methods enhance efficiency and lower costs in predicting MDAs. We trained the Accurate Matrix Completion for predicting potential MiRNA-Disease Associations (AMCMDA) model in this work, utilizing truncated nuclear norm minimization to improve the prediction accuracy. In AMCMDA, we begin by constructing a heterogeneous network incorporating both similarity and association information between miRNAs and diseases. Second, an optimization framework is designed to complete the effective approximation of the truncated nuclear norm to complement the missing values of the objective matrix. Finally, we solve this optimization problem via Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers and obtain the final prediction scores. After comparing the AMCMDA model with other models across three validation frameworks and three different datasets, we find that the AMCMDA model demonstrates robust and accurate performance. The model's excellent performance is also demonstrated by two categories of case studies on three diseases.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.