Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Imaging-based tracking of stem-cell responses for 3D bioprinting optimization

Karabinskyi B., Alkhimova S., Holembiovska O.

Narrative Review, published in Cell Transplant (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cell Transplant (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42179090
PMCID
PMC13201929
DOI
10.1177/09636897261445006

Abstract (original English)

This review examines how mechanical and chemical stimuli shape stem-cell behavior and how live-cell imaging combined with artificial intelligence can support the evaluation and optimization of 3D bioprinting workflows. Current evidence indicates that substrate stiffness, stretch, shear stress, compression, and soluble factors such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) influence viability, migration, morphology, and lineage commitment in biopolymeric constructs. Imaging modalities including phase-contrast, fluorescence, confocal, two-photon, and light-sheet microscopy enable dynamic observation of these responses, while computational pipelines for segmentation, tracking, and feature extraction improve scalability and reproducibility of analysis. Across the reviewed studies, image-derived readouts such as cell distribution, motility, adhesion patterns, and early morphological changes emerge as promising indicators of construct quality and maturation potential. At the same time, broader application remains limited by phototoxicity, imaging depth constraints, data-processing demands, incomplete standardization of metrics, and restricted model generalizability. Overall, imaging-based cell tracking integrated with AI-assisted analysis offers a practical fr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Stem CellsAnimalsHumansBioprintingPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.