Imaging the Stromal Vascular Fraction during Soft-Tissue Reconstruction.
Bliley JM., Satish L., McLaughlin MM., Kling RE., Day JR., Grahovac TL.
Animal Study, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Plast Reconstr Surg (2015)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 26595017
- DOI
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001815
- Citations
- 10
Abstract (original English)
Although fat grafting is an increasingly popular practice, suboptimal volume retention remains an obstacle. Graft enrichment with the stromal vascular fraction has gained attention as a method of increasing graft retention. However, few studies have assessed the fate and impact of transplanted stromal vascular fraction on fat grafts. In vivo imaging techniques can be used to help determine the influence stromal vascular fraction has on transplanted fat. Stromal vascular fraction was labeled with 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide (DiR), a near-infrared dye, and tracked in vivo. Proliferation and differentiation of labeled cells were assessed to confirm that labeling did not adversely affect cellular function. Different doses of labeled stromal vascular fraction were tracked within fat grafts over time using the in vivo imaging system. No significant differences in differentiation and proliferation were observed in labeled versus unlabeled cells (p > 0.05). A pilot study confirmed that stromal vascular fraction fluorescence was localized to fat grafts and different cell doses could be distinguished. A larger-scale in vivo study revealed that stromal vascular fraction fluorescence was statistically significant (p < 0.05) between different cell dose groups and this significance was maintained in higher doses (3 × 10(6) and 2 × 10(6) cells/ml of fat gr
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.