Immunogenic cryptic peptides dominate the antigenic landscape of ovarian cancer
Raja R., Mangalaparthi KK., Madugundu AK., Jessen E., Pathangey L., Magtibay P.
Laboratory Study, published in Sci Adv (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Sci Adv (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39970218
- PMCID
- PMC11837991
- DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.ads7405
- Citations
- 10
Abstract (original English)
Increased infiltration of CD3 + and CD8 + T cells into ovarian cancer (OC) is linked to better prognosis, but the specific antigens involved are unclear. Recent reports suggest that HLA class I can present peptides from noncoding genomic regions, known as noncanonical or cryptic peptides, but their immunogenicity is underexplored. To address this, we used immunopeptidomic analysis and RNA sequencing on five metastatic OC samples, which identified 311 cryptic peptides (40 to 83 per patient). Despite comprising less than 1% of total peptides, cryptic peptides from noncoding transcripts emerged as the predominant antigen class when compared to the other major classes of known tumor-specific and tumor-associated antigens in OC samples. Notably, nearly 70% of the prioritized cryptic peptides elicited T cell activation, as evidenced by increased 4-1BB and IFN-γ expression in autologous CD8 + T cells. This study reveals noncoding cryptic peptides as an important class of immunogenic antigens in OC.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.