Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Immunogenicity of allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells in a rat spinal fusion model.

McIntosh KR., Lopez MJ., Borneman JN., Spencer ND., Anderson PA., Gimble JM.

Animal Study on Back & Spine, published in Tissue Eng Part A (2009) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Tissue Eng Part A (2009)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
19207041
PMCID
PMC2746330
DOI
10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0566
Citations
52

Abstract (original English)

Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) express a nonimmunogenic profile as shown by in vitro studies that demonstrate a lack of T cell proliferation to allogeneic ASCs as well as ASC-mediated suppression of mixed lymphocyte reactions. To determine whether these observations would translate in vivo, immune monitoring studies were carried out in conjunction with a rat spinal fusion study. ASCs derived from Fischer or ACI strain rats were loaded onto scaffolds and implanted in Fischer recipients that had undergone the following treatments: (1) No treatment; (2) Scaffold only; (3) Syngeneic ASCs+Scaffold; or (4) Allogeneic ASCs+Scaffold. Half of each group was sacrificed at 4 weeks postimplantation, and the remaining animals were sacrificed at 8 weeks. As determined in a separate study, allogeneic and syngeneic ASCs were equally efficacious in accelerating spinal fusion compared to No treatment and Scaffold only control groups. To determine whether donor ASCs induced an immune response in recipient rats, lymph nodes were harvested for T cell proliferation studies and serum was collected to assess antibody responses. Although T cell priming was not detected to donor alloantigens in recipients at either time point, significant antibody responses were detected to ACI ASCs in animals implanted with syngeneic or allogeneic ASCs. Antibodies were of the IgG isotype, noncytotoxic in the presenc

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsAntibodiesAntibody FormationCell ProliferationConcanavalin AFlow CytometryImmune ToleranceImmunity, CellularModels, Animal

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research