Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Impact of mesenchymal stem cells derived conditioned media on neural progenitor cells.

Humenik F., Jego S., Hornakova L., Maloveska M., Valencakova-Agyagosova A., Vikartovska Z.

Animal Study on Neuroinflammation, published in Gen Physiol Biophys (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Gen Physiol Biophys (2021)
Country
Slovakia
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34897026
DOI
10.4149/gpb_2021026

Abstract (original English)

Neurodegenerative diseases are common problem for companion animals. Due to the limited ability of injured axons to regenerate, innovative therapies combined with rehabilitation have been applied and evaluated. Among them, stem cells and their conditioned media implantation, which can ameliorate damaged tissue has been suggested as a promising treatment strategy. The main goal of our study was to characterize mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) derived from canine adipose tissue (AT-MSC) and umbilical cord (UC-MSC) and analyse effect of their conditioned media (CM) on neurite outgrowth of neural progenitor cells isolated from the brain cortex of neonatal rats. MSC from both sources showed high osteogenic and chondrogenic potential and expression of CD90 and CD29. Furthermore, both UC-MSCCM and AT-MSCCM stimulated neurite growth. Interestingly, this effect was more pronounced with UC-MSCCM when compared to AT-MSCCM in vitro, which may be related to the different content of neurotrophic factors included in the CM.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsCell DifferentiationCulture Media, ConditionedDogsMesenchymal Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsRatsUmbilical Cord

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research